Grismore v. United Recovery Systems, L.P.

[David A. Szwak]

Grismore v. United Recovery Systems, L.P.
Slip Copy, 2006 WL 2246359
D.Ariz.,2006.
August 03, 2006

In regard to paragraph 30 of Count 1, Plaintiff fails to present genuine issue of material fact to defeat Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant violated 15 U.S.C. § 1692d(5) of the FDCPA by causing Plaintiff's telephone to ring constantly. Section 1692d(5) states that a debt collector may not cause “a telephone to ring or engag[e] any person in a telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number.â€