Rule 68 Does Not Apply if Offeree Totally Loses Cases

Federal and State Rules of Procedure provide cost and sometimes attorney's fee shifting mechanisms for defendants to attempt to force plaintiffs/consumers to accept proposed settlements. This forum provides a source of information for how these rules may impact the litigation.

Post Reply
David A. Szwak
Posts: 1974
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:19 pm

Rule 68 Does Not Apply if Offeree Totally Loses Cases

Post by David A. Szwak »

Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. August
450 U.S. 346, 101 S.Ct. 1146
U.S.Ill.,1981.
March 09, 1981



The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied a defense motion for costs incurred in defending equal employment opportunity action, and defendant appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 600 F.2d 699. On certiorari, the Supreme Court, Justice Stevens, held that the rule under which if plaintiff rejects defendant's formal settlement offer and if the judgment finally obtained by the offeree is not more favorable than the offer the plaintiff must pay costs incurred after making of the offer does not apply where judgment is entered against the plaintiff offeree and in favor of defendant offeror.
Affirmed.
Justice Powell filed a concurring opinion.
Justice Rehnquist dissented and filed opinion in which Chief Justice Berger and Justice Stewart joined.

Justice STEVENS delivered the opinion of the Court.
Pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, if a plaintiff rejects a defendant's formal settlement offer, and if “the judgment finally obtained by the offeree is *348 not more favorable than the offer,â€
David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-221-6444
Fax 318-221-6555
Post Reply

Return to “Offers of Judgment In FDCPA Litigation”