Attorney Fees Are Not "Costs" Under Rule 68

Federal and State Rules of Procedure provide cost and sometimes attorney's fee shifting mechanisms for defendants to attempt to force plaintiffs/consumers to accept proposed settlements. This forum provides a source of information for how these rules may impact the litigation.

Post Reply
David A. Szwak
Posts: 1974
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:19 pm

Attorney Fees Are Not "Costs" Under Rule 68

Post by David A. Szwak »

Marek v. Chesny
473 U.S. 1, 105 S.Ct. 3012
U.S.Ill.,1985.
June 27, 1985

The second question we address is whether the term “costsâ€
David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-221-6444
Fax 318-221-6555
David A. Szwak
Posts: 1974
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:19 pm

Post by David A. Szwak »

McCain v. Detroit II Auto Finance Center
378 F.3d 561
C.A.6 (Mich.),2004.
August 05, 2004

Prevailing debtor who accepted offer of judgment against creditor in action pursuant to the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, and the Michigan Credit Reform Act moved for attorney fees. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Patrick J. Duggan, J., 228 F.Supp.2d 799, denied motion. Debtor appealed.

Holding: The Court of Appeals, Milton I. Shadur, District Judge, sitting by designation, held that debtor's acceptance of offer of judgment of $3,000 “as to all claims and causes of actionsâ€
David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-221-6444
Fax 318-221-6555
Post Reply

Return to “Offers of Judgment In FDCPA Litigation”