Berkery v. Cross Country Bank

Post Reply
David A. Szwak
Posts: 1974
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:19 pm

Berkery v. Cross Country Bank

Post by David A. Szwak »

Consumer brought action against credit card issuer, collection agents, and two independent credit reporting agencies, alleging various state law claims and violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) based on their allegedly inaccurate reporting of his credit history. Defendants moved to compel arbitration and to stay all proceedings pending the completion of arbitration. The District Court, Eduardo C. Robreno, J., held that: (1) consumer's claim fell within the substantive scope of the arbitration clause contained in the credit card agreement between consumer and issuer; (2) purported settlement agreement between consumer and issuer's agent did not terminate the parties' agreement to arbitrate disputes covered by the credit card agreement's arbitration clause; and (3) under the circumstances, all claims against all defendants would be stayed. Motion to compel arbitration granted and proceedings stayed.
Berkery v. Cross Country Bank, 256 F.Supp.2d 359, E.D.Pa., Apr. 11, 2003.
David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-221-6444
Fax 318-221-6555
Post Reply

Return to “Arbitration, Forum Selection, Choice of Law, Choice of Venue and Other Adhesionary Clauses”