WestLaw Reportings [cases and cites to] Through 1/29/2007

Post Reply
David A. Szwak
Posts: 1974
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:19 pm

WestLaw Reportings [cases and cites to] Through 1/29/2007

Post by David A. Szwak »

1. Catencamp v. Cendant Timeshare Resort Group-Consumer Finance, Inc.,
471 F.3d 780, C.A.7 (Wis.), December 14, 2006 (NO. 06-2030)

...however, either sophistication or guesswork. Courts must analyze debt-collection communications from the perspective of unsophisticated recipients. See Gammon v. GC Services Limited Partnership, 27 F.3d 1254 (7th Cir.1994) The effect of a potentially misleading acronym is the subject of...


2. Gully v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC,
Slip Copy, 2006 WL 3486815, N.D.Ill., December 01, 2006 (NO. 04 C 6849)

...claim is misleading or deceptive, a court evaluates FDCPA claims from the perspective of an “unsophisticated debtor.â€
David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
Fax 318-221-6555
Post Reply

Return to “GC Services”