Clomon v. Jackson

Post Reply
David A. Szwak
Posts: 1974
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:19 pm

Clomon v. Jackson

Post by David A. Szwak »

In Clomon v. Jackson,988 F.2d 1314, 1321 (2d Cir. 1993), the Second Circuit found that the use of an attorney's name in the letterhead and at the conclusion of the debt collector's dunning letter, where the attorney did not review the file, violated the FDCPA. [..."there will be few, if any, cases in which a mass-produced collection letter bearing the facsimile of an attorney's signature will comply with the restrictions imposed by 1692e"].
Post Reply

Return to “False Representation That Communication is From an Attorney”