It is currently Wed Oct 23, 2019 4:46 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Braun v. Stawiarski,
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 3:58 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:19 am
Posts: 1687
Braun v. Stawiarski,
Slip Copy, 2006 WL 2793150, D.Colo., September 28, 2006 (NO. CIVA03CV02098WDMPAC)

ORDER ON RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE


WALKER D. MILLER, District Judge.
*1 This matter is before me on the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Coan, issued August 24, 2006, that defendant Washington Mutual Bank's motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 144) be granted. Plaintiff has not objected to this recommendation and is therefore not entitled to de novo review. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

I have reviewed the pertinent portions of the record in this case, including the motion, plaintiff's response, and the recommendation. I agree with Magistrate Judge Coan that the case should be dismissed with prejudice.

Accordingly, it is ordered:

1. The Recommendation of United States Judge Coan is accepted;

2. Washington Mutual Bank's motion for summary judgment is granted and all claims against said defendant are dismissed with prejudice;

3. Defendant may have its costs; and

4. This case shall be terminated.


PATRICIA A. COAN, United States Magistrate Judge.


RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff's pro se claims arise out of foreclosure proceedings on her family home which began in June of 2002. Ms. Braun contends that Washington Mutual Bank violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. and the Colorado Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Colo.Rev.Stat. (C .R.S.) § 12-14-101, et seq. Plaintiff also seeks relief under the Colorado Uniform Consumer Credit Code, C.R.S. § 5-1-101, et seq.

On March 5, 2004, this action was referred for pretrial case management and for proposed rulings on dispositive motions. See Doc. # 9. The matter now before the court is Defendant Washington Mutual Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment with Incorporated Brief, filed on November 14, 2005 [doc. # 144]. Plaintiff has responded. The motion is ripe for disposition and I have determined that oral argument would not be of material assistance.



I. Background

Plaintiff alleges ten claims. None of the claims contains any reference to specific dates or documents. Plaintiff asserts claims against “defendantsâ€

_________________
David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-221-6444
Fax 318-221-6555


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group