It is currently Wed Oct 23, 2019 4:23 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: In re Nangle
PostPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:08 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:19 am
Posts: 1687
In re Nangle
257 B.R. 276
8th Cir.BAP (Mo.),2001.
January 04, 2001

The jury verdict in favor of Siemer does not state whether it was based upon Count I (federal claim) or Count II (federal and *284 state claims combined) of the complaint.FN9 Although, the type of damages awarded, for “mental distress, embarrassment···,â€

_________________
David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-221-6444
Fax 318-221-6555


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group