Amending to Destroy Federal Jurisdiction

Post Reply
David A. Szwak
Posts: 1974
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:19 pm

Post by David A. Szwak »

Again, this Court notes that the crucial point of inquiry in determining whether Defendant has met its burden in proving that the amount in controversy meets the jurisdictional minimum is the time of removal. Hood urges this Court to look to his affidavit, stipulation, and amended Complaint, all filed post-removal, and find that the amount in controversy requirement has not been fulfilled, thereby requiring remand to Circuit Court. However, the Seventh Circuit has noted that it follows the Supreme Court's holding in St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co., 303 U.S. 283, 288, 58 S.Ct. 586, 82 L.Ed. 845 (1938), which held that jurisdiction is not stripped from the district court where, “the plaintiff after removal, by stipulation, by affidavit, or by amendment of his pleadings, reduces the claim below the requisite amount.â€
David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-221-6444
Fax 318-221-6555
Post Reply

Return to “Removal to Federal Court and Remand to State Court: Important Considerations When Suing or Being Sued: Do You Want to be in Federal Court or State Cou”