It is currently Fri Oct 18, 2019 1:45 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2007 2:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:19 am
Posts: 1687
Alleged tortfeasors sustained injury caused by collection agency's practice of sending deceptive notices to alleged tortfeasors to collect on automobile insurers' subrogation claims, even though they made no payment and obtained attorneys' advice and one alleged tortfeasor recovered damages; the alleged tortfeasors spent time and incurred costs for credit reports and credit watch services to investigate fear of damaged credit, and even though one alleged tortfeasor consulted attorney representing her on her personal injury claim, her expenses for that consultation were caused by the notices. West's RCWA 19.86.020, 19.86.090.

Stephens v. Omni Ins. Co.
--- P.3d ----, 2007 WL 1180497
Wash.App. Div. 1,2007.
April 23, 2007

_________________
David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-221-6444
Fax 318-221-6555


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group