It is currently Thu May 28, 2020 3:55 am

All times are UTC

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2007 2:41 am 
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:19 am
Posts: 1687
Alleged tortfeasors sustained injury caused by collection agency's practice of sending deceptive notices to alleged tortfeasors to collect on automobile insurers' subrogation claims, even though they made no payment and obtained attorneys' advice and one alleged tortfeasor recovered damages; the alleged tortfeasors spent time and incurred costs for credit reports and credit watch services to investigate fear of damaged credit, and even though one alleged tortfeasor consulted attorney representing her on her personal injury claim, her expenses for that consultation were caused by the notices. West's RCWA 19.86.020, 19.86.090.

Stephens v. Omni Ins. Co.
--- P.3d ----, 2007 WL 1180497
Wash.App. Div. 1,2007.
April 23, 2007

David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
Fax 318-221-6555

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group