It is currently Sat Jul 04, 2020 8:49 pm

All times are UTC

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 8:25 am 
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:19 am
Posts: 1687
Grismore v. United Recovery Systems, L.P.
Slip Copy, 2006 WL 2246359
August 03, 2006

In regard to paragraph 30 of Count 1, Plaintiff fails to present genuine issue of material fact to defeat Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant violated 15 U.S.C. § 1692d(5) of the FDCPA by causing Plaintiff's telephone to ring constantly. Section 1692d(5) states that a debt collector may not cause “a telephone to ring or engag[e] any person in a telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number.â€

David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
Fax 318-221-6555

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group