It is currently Wed Oct 16, 2019 2:52 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 30, 2006 8:25 am 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:19 am
Posts: 1687
Grismore v. United Recovery Systems, L.P.
Slip Copy, 2006 WL 2246359
D.Ariz.,2006.
August 03, 2006

In regard to paragraph 30 of Count 1, Plaintiff fails to present genuine issue of material fact to defeat Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff alleges that Defendant violated 15 U.S.C. § 1692d(5) of the FDCPA by causing Plaintiff's telephone to ring constantly. Section 1692d(5) states that a debt collector may not cause “a telephone to ring or engag[e] any person in a telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number.â€

_________________
David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-221-6444
Fax 318-221-6555


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group