It is currently Mon Mar 30, 2020 7:06 am

All times are UTC

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:51 pm 
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:19 am
Posts: 1687
Niederriter v. CSC Credit Services, Inc.
Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2005 WL 2647951
October 17, 2005


*1 This matter is before me on Defendant Capitol One's motion to compel arbitration and dismiss or stay the proceedings [# 28]. Plaintiff acknowledges that an arbitration agreement exists, but argues that the agreement is unconscionable and should not be enforced. Because I find that the arbitration agreement is valid and not unconscionable, I will grant the motion, and I will stay the case as to Capitol One pending completion of arbitration.


Plaintiff alleges violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., against Capitol One and three other defendants. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that Capitol One “has been reporting derogatory and inaccurate statements and information relating to Plaintiff and Plaintiff's credit history to third parties.â€

David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
Fax 318-221-6555

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group