It is currently Fri Oct 18, 2019 2:09 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 9:51 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:19 am
Posts: 1687
Niederriter v. CSC Credit Services, Inc.
Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2005 WL 2647951
E.D.Mo.,2005.
October 17, 2005

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


SIPPEL, J.
*1 This matter is before me on Defendant Capitol One's motion to compel arbitration and dismiss or stay the proceedings [# 28]. Plaintiff acknowledges that an arbitration agreement exists, but argues that the agreement is unconscionable and should not be enforced. Because I find that the arbitration agreement is valid and not unconscionable, I will grant the motion, and I will stay the case as to Capitol One pending completion of arbitration.



I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff alleges violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., against Capitol One and three other defendants. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that Capitol One “has been reporting derogatory and inaccurate statements and information relating to Plaintiff and Plaintiff's credit history to third parties.â€

_________________
David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-221-6444
Fax 318-221-6555


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group