It is currently Fri Oct 18, 2019 2:42 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin

Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 6:19 am
Posts: 1687
Borrower sued bank that financed automobile purchase alleging bank converted cash found in automobile upon repossession. The Circuit Court, Calhoun County, R. Joel Laird, Jr., J., granted borrower's motion to set aside prior order compelling arbitration in accordance with loan agreement. Bank appealed. The Court of Civil Appeals, L. Charles Wright, Retired Appellate Judge, held that: (1) test for whether Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) compels arbitration is whether at time parties entered into loan contract and accepted arbitration clause, they "contemplated substantial interstate commerce," and not "slightest nexus" test; (2) parties did not "contemplate substantial interstate activity" in entering into loan agreement for purchase of automobile so as to require mandatory arbitration under FAA; and (3) mere fact that bank was regulated by federal government did not establish that parties "contemplated substantial interstate activity" during their dealings. Affirmed.

First Alabama Bank v. Burgess, 681 So.2d 134, Ala.Civ.App., Jul 08, 1994.

_________________
David Szwak
Chairman, Consumer Protection Section, Louisiana State Bar Association
Bodenheimer, Jones & Szwak
509 Market Street, 7th Floor
Mid South Tower
Shreveport, Louisiana 71101
318-221-6444
Fax 318-221-6555


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group