Hoogstra v. West Asset Management, Inc.,

[David A. Szwak]

Hoogstra v. West Asset Management, Inc.,
Slip Copy, 2006 WL 2239090, E.D.Tex., August 04, 2006

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

RICHARD A. SCHELL, District Judge.
*1 The following are pending before the court:
1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment and brief in support (docket entry # 24);
2. Plaintiff's objections to Defendant's summary judgment evidence and motion to strike (docket entry # 31);
3. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's objections to Defendant's summary judgment evidence and motion to strike (docket entry # 33);
4. Plaintiff's response to Defendant's motion for summary judgment (docket entry # 32); and
5. Defendant's reply in support of motion for summary judgment (docket entry # 34).
Having considered the Defendant's motion for summary judgment and the respective responsive briefing thereto, the court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.


OBJECTIONS

The Plaintiff objects to certain evidence presented by the Defendant and moves to disregard the same. Specifically, the Plaintiff objects to the affidavits of Rhonda Lukie (“Lukieâ€